Theism.net Options: home | articles | books | search | webmaster
.gif){kind=small}
e-mail:
j
How We Can Affect It All
Americans can affect it all by demanding
(through political involvement via polls, letters, and petitions) that the
following scenario becomes ludicrous and unthinkable in
MAKE BIG MONEY!
Enter the Lucrative "Not Raising Hogs" Business Today!
Mr. Clayton Yeutter
Secretary of Agriculture
Washington, D. C.
Dear Sir,
·
· My friends, Wayne and Janelle, over at
What I want to know is, in your opinion, what is the best type of farm not to raise hogs on, and what is the best breed of hogs not to raise? I want to be sure that I approach this endeavor in keeping with all government policies. I would prefer not to raise Razor hogs, but if that isn’t a good breed not to raise, then I can just as easily not raise Yorkshires or Durocs.
As I see it, the hardest part of this program will be in keeping an accurate inventory of how many hogs I haven’t raised.
My friend Wayne is very excited about the future of the business. He has been raising hogs for 20 years and the most he ever made was $420 in 1970, until this year when he got your check for $1,000 for not raising hogs.
If I can get $1,000 for not raising 50 hogs, will I get $2,000 for not raising 100 hogs? I plan to operate on a small scale at first, holding myself down to about 4,000 "not raised" hogs, which will give me $80,000 income the first year. Then I can afford an airplane.
Now another thing, these hogs I will not raise will not eat 100,000 bushels of corn. I understand that you also pay farmers for not raising corn and wheat. Will I qualify for payments for not raising wheat and corn not to feed the 4,000 hogs I am not going to raise?
I want to get started not feeding as soon as possible as this seems to be a good time of year not to raise hogs and grain.
I am also considering the "not milking cows" business, so please send me any information on that also.
In view of these circumstances, I understand that the government will consider me totally unemployed, so I plan to file for unemployment and food stamps.
Be assured that you will have my vote in the coming elections.
Patriotically yours,
Otis Deal
P.S. Would you please notify me when you plan to distribute more free cheese? d
(Reprinted with permission from the Advocates for Self-Government: http://www.self-gov.org.)
Americans can best affect
Swindall dismisses the U. S. Taxpayer’s party as not viable to win office. If the party were larger, it would most likely win his heartfelt support. His political stance suggests a libertarian basis, but he harbors moral conflicts with the Libertarian Party.
Many voting citizens (Democrat and Republican) feel disgruntled with their choices of candidates at the polls. Should they, combined with the non-voting disgruntled Americans, vote outside the two established parties, an outside party could win.
Commonly, disgruntled voters espouse off-party ideals, yet vote for traditional party candidates. Their reasoning? "One of the two [Republican or Democrat] will win. ‘So and so’ is the lesser evil." Not surprisingly, both democratic and republican voters often feel disgruntled and "hold their noses" while voting.
In
Perhaps the cause of the two major parties’ appoggiatura is that most high-level politicians of both parties belong to entities such as the Council on Foreign Relations and/or the Tri-lateral Commission. If a reader enjoys a fright, a look into, and an understanding of those entities will facilitate thrills. Indeed, most democrats and republicans serve in the same battalion. The two parties present adversarial relationships with each other (not unlike championship wrestlers professing a desire to wrest their counterparts limb by limb). Nevertheless, they pursue the same goal (keep the viewers’ focus). To this end, they convince the public they are enemies and the battle rages. The public, distracted by the skirmishes, loses its focus and subsequently the war.
Christians supporting
·
· Republican politicians give us the political equivalence of
1-900 phone sex. They tell us that we’re special. They ask us what we
really want, and tell us that they want it too. Then they start breathing heavy
and get excited by what we want. They tell us their fantasy for us. They tease
us and tempt us. They arouse our passions. They tell us how much they want it
and how good it’s going to be. When we hang up from the 1-900 Republican
tax-cut fantasy line, we realize three things: They cost us a lot of money, the
real thing is more satisfying, and they’re never going to come over....The
republican politicians have given us a huge, bloated government that the
socialists in 1930 never even dreamed of....We’ve heard also the big
budget battles. They [Republicans and Democrats] can’t agree because
Republicans supposedly want smaller government. Read the fine print. The
Democrats want to increase spending $55 billion a year. The Republicans want to
increase spending $45 billion dollars a year. Do the math. Divide that over the
population of the
(As broadcast on C-SPAN 1996.)
Many groups advocate constitutional
conservatism. Their foci differ; yet each offers educational materials and
approaches to excoriating
Contact information for advocates of constitutional government (listed alphabetically) follows. A listing here does not imply Swindall’s endorsement. Instead, it offers readers varied limited-government perspectives. Some are theistic; others are not. Each contains intertwining ideals for readers to evaluate for themselves.
Advocates for Self-Government,
Drug Policy Foundation, 4455 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite B-500, Washington, DC 20008-2328, (202) 537-5005, Fax:(202) 537-3007, email:dpf@dpf.org, web: http://www.dpf.org.
Fully Informed Jury Association,
406-793-5550,
John Birch Society,
Libertarian Party,
U. S. Taxpayer’s Party, contact information is currently unavailable.
e-mail:
j
Theism.net Options: home | articles | books | search | webmaster